Garmin’s recent introduction of the Forerunner 165 has expanded its range to include a much-needed budget-friendly option. However, the Forerunner 55 still holds the title of being the most economical way to sport a Garmin running watch.
Released in 2021, the Forerunner 55 might see an update in 2024—however, those with a budget between $150-$300 face a challenging decision for now.
This comprehensive guide will dissect the crucial aspects to consider when choosing between the Garmin Forerunner 165 and the Forerunner 55.
Let’s delve into the details Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Forerunner 55.
Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Forerunner 55 Spec
 |  | |
|---|---|---|
| Feature | Garmin Forerunner 165 | Garmin Forerunner 55 |
| Weight | 39g | 37g |
| Dimensions | 43 x 43 x 11.6 mm | 42 x 42 x 11.6 mm |
| Display Type | 1.2-inch AMOLED | 1.04-inch transflective MIP |
| Music Storage | Available in Music Edition | Not available |
| Running Features | GPS, HR Monitoring, Garmin Coach, PacePro, Race Widget, Daily Suggested Workouts, Running Dynamics, VO2 Max, Training Effect, HRV Status | GPS, HR Monitoring, Garmin Coach, PacePro, Race Predictor, Daily Suggested Workouts |
| Health & Sleep Features | Sleep Tracking (Advanced), Nap Detection, Stress Monitoring, Body Battery (Advanced), Pulse Ox | Sleep Tracking (Basic), Stress Monitoring, Body Battery (Basic) |
| Smart Features | Smartphone Notifications, Music Support (Music Edition), Pulse Ox | Smartphone Notifications |
| Battery Life (Watch Mode) | Up to 11 days | Up to 14 days |
| Battery Life (GPS) | Up to 19 hours | Up to 20 hours |
| Water Resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Connectivity | Bluetooth, ANT+ | Bluetooth, ANT+ |
| Price | Check Price on Amazon | Check Price on Amazon |
Also See:-
Style and Comfort
A running watch should be a performance tool and a comfortable and stylish accessory. Both the Garmin Forerunner 165 and Forerunner 55 excel in design and comfort.
The Forerunner 165 weighs in at 39g, slightly heavier than the Forerunner 55’s 37g. However, this difference is negligible, ensuring a comfortable fit for various wrist sizes. The emphasis on lightweight design reflects a commitment to user comfort during prolonged wear.
Regarding display, the Forerunner 165 boasts a more extensive and vibrant AMOLED collection, providing superior clarity even in bright sunlight. In contrast, the Forerunner 55 features a smaller transflective MIP display known for its efficiency in conserving battery life. Your choice between these displays may depend on outdoor visibility and the importance of extended battery performance.
In summary, both devices prioritize user comfort and offer sleek designs, with the display choice boiling down to personal preferences and usage patterns.
Running Features for Avid Runners
For avid runners, a running watch’s features can significantly impact training and performance. The Garmin Forerunner 165 and 55 cover the essentials, including GPS, heart rate monitoring, Garmin Coach, PacePro, and more.
The Forerunner 165, however, takes a step ahead by incorporating additional features such as Running Dynamics, VO2 Max, and HRV Status. These features provide in-depth insights into running performance, making it an ideal choice for those committed to elevating their running game.
When deciding, consider your running goals and whether the additional features of the Forerunner 165 align with your training needs. If you’re seeking a device that goes beyond the basics and offers comprehensive running metrics, the Forerunner 165 may be the preferred choice.
Health, Sleep, and Smart Features
Holistic health tracking has become a pivotal aspect of modern fitness devices, and both the Garmin Forerunner 165 and Forerunner 55 incorporate health-focused features.
The Forerunner 165 leads with advanced sleep tracking, nap detection, and Pulse Ox technology. Additionally, it provides a detailed breakdown of Body Battery activities, offering a comprehensive overview of overall health. These features make the Forerunner 165 a running companion and a holistic health tracker.
In contrast, the Forerunner 55 focuses on fundamental health tracking and essential intelligent features such as smartphone notifications. This simplicity makes it ideal for users who prioritize core health metrics without needing advanced features.
When deciding between these two devices, consider your preference for in-depth health insights versus a straightforward health tracking approach.
Garmin Forerunner 165 vs 55 Battery Life
A running watch’s battery life is critical, especially for users engaging in long-distance runs or extended outdoor activities.
The Forerunner 55 claims victory on paper with an impressive 14 days in watch mode and 20 hours with GPS.
On the other hand, the Forerunner 165 offers a respectable 11 days in smartwatch mode and 19 hours with GPS.
The choice between these devices regarding battery life depends on your usage patterns. If you prioritize longer battery life for extended outdoor activities and less frequent charging, the Forerunner 55 becomes an appealing option.
However, if you can compromise slightly on battery life for additional features, the Forerunner 165 remains a compelling choice.
Consider your running habits, the frequency of charging convenience, and the overall balance of features that align with your preferences when deciding on battery life as a determining factor.
Affordable Options (Price Point)
Budget considerations are often a deciding factor when choosing the right running watch. The Garmin Forerunner 165 and Forerunner 55 cater to users looking for a balance between features and cost-effectiveness.
The Garmin Forerunner 165 comes in two versions: the standard model priced at approx $249/£249 and the Music edition at $299/£289. The Music edition introduces music storage capabilities, an enticing feature for those who prefer a soundtrack to accompany their runs.
Conversely, the Forerunner 55 is priced at $193.99 (price may vary ) for the standard version, presenting a more budget-friendly option without the additional cost associated with music functionality.
Considering your budget and the importance of music access during workouts is paramount in deciding between these two models. If you’re seeking a budget-friendly option that still encompasses essential features, the Forerunner 55 is appealing, offering affordability without sacrificing functionality.
Verdict and Recommendations
In conclusion, choosing between the Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Forerunner 55 involves carefully considering various factors.
Both the Garmin Forerunner 165 and 55 are solid running companions, but they cater to different needs. Before making your choice, ask yourself:
Are you a data-driven runner who craves a vibrant display and advanced metrics? If so, the Forerunner 165 is your champion. It tracks your runs in detail, stores music for offline listening, and boasts a stunning AMOLED screen. However, be prepared for a slightly shorter battery life and a higher price tag (around $300).
Do you prioritize affordability and long battery life, even if it means sacrificing some fancy features? Then the Forerunner 55 might be your perfect match. It offers reliable run tracking, basic training insights, and a week-long battery life at a budget-friendly price.
The Garmin Forerunner 165 and Forerunner 55 are reliable running companions, each catering to different user needs. The Forerunner 165 is ideal for intermediate or advanced beginners seeking advanced features. At the same time, the Forerunner 55 provides excellent value for those initiating their fitness journey.
Ultimately, the best choice depends on your priorities and preferences. Dive into the Garmin Forerunner series, explore your needs, and choose the watch that fuels your fitness journey!
Ready to make your choice? Dive into the Garmin Forerunner series, considering your priorities and preferences, and embark on a fitness journey tailored to you!
Garmin Forerunner 55
Garmin Forerunner 165
You may also like:-
FAQs: Garmin Forerunner 165 vs Forerunner 55
Q. How does the new Garmin Forerunner 165 compare to the Forerunner 55?
The new Garmin Forerunner 165 boasts a vibrant AMOLED display, advanced running features, music storage, and Garmin Pay, but comes at a higher price and shorter battery life compared to the older Forerunner 55. While the 55 offers a longer battery life and affordability, it lacks the bells and whistles of its newer counterpart, settling for a basic MIP display and fewer functionalities. Ultimately, the choice boils down to your budget and priorities: prioritize features and a stunning display, go for the 165; value affordability and longer battery life, the 55 might be your match. Consider your activity level and display your preference for the final decision.
Q2. Is Forerunner 55 worth it?
Picking the right Garmin watch can be tricky, especially if you’re new to running or on a budget. The Forerunner 55 is like a friendly neighbour who offers a helping hand at a great price. It tracks your runs, shows you how fast you’re going, and keeps ticking even after days of use. But it doesn’t have all the fancy bells and whistles like storing music or showing fancy graphs about your workout.
If you’re just starting out or just want the basics, the 55 is a great choice. But if you’re a serious runner who needs all the data and techy stuff, you might want to look at other options like the Forerunner 165. Think of it like choosing a bike: the 55 is a sturdy, reliable one for casual rides, while the 165 is like a high-tech racing bike with all the bells and whistles.
Ultimately, the best choice depends on what you need and how much you’re willing to spend. If you’re not sure, the 55 is a great starting point!
Q. Which Garmin is best for beginner runners?
Choosing the Best Garmin Watch for Beginner Runners
Based on current information, the Garmin Forerunner 55 stands out as an excellent choice for beginning runners due to its balance of features and affordability. Key benefits include a budget-friendly price point at $179.99
User-friendly interface
Decent battery life (up to 14 days in smartwatch mode, 20 hours in GPS mode)
Essential training metrics like heart rate monitoring and sleep tracking
Lightweight design suitable for everyday wear
However, if you prefer a more comprehensive set of features and are willing to invest in a higher-end watch, the Garmin Forerunner 265 is recommended. Although priced higher at around $449, it boasts: an AMOLED touchscreen display
Increased accuracy and functionality compared to the Forerunner 55
Extensive training analytics and metrics
Offline music storage and playback
Longer battery life (up to 11 days in smartwatch mode, 19 hours in GPS mode)
Ultimately, the decision depends on individual priorities, budget constraints, and desired features. Both watches are highly regarded among runners, and either choice should serve as a reliable partner during your running journey
